GitHub Pages vs DeployHTML
Repository-based static publishing compared with a paste-or-upload starting point.
What GitHub Pages documents
GitHub Pages serves static HTML, CSS, and JavaScript from a GitHub repository, optionally through a build process.
That repository-based model is different from pasting a single document into a publishing widget.
How DeployHTML approaches the work
Start with pasted HTML, an HTML file, or a ZIP. A Free project has a public link for 24 hours and a required badge. Basic adds a source editor, private drafts, latest 3 versions, analytics, feedback, and password access. Pro is scoped to forms and CSV, owner notifications, and invitations. Custom domains are coming soon.
Basic is $5/month or $48/year; Pro is $15/month or $144/year. Payment availability depends on verified configuration. Custom domains are not currently available. These are DeployHTML’s limits, not statements about the other provider.
Choose around your actual workflow
A useful candidate for documentation and static projects already maintained in a GitHub repository, subject to GitHub’s terms and usage policies.
Consider where your source lives, who makes updates, and whether repository review or a lightweight online HTML editor better fits that team.
Publish the same representative package on your shortlist, check its assets and interactions, and review each provider’s current terms, resource limits, and billing. Feature lists alone do not demonstrate reliability, security, or business outcomes.